Now what the hell is this all about? Too many questions. Is Pavlich throwing out the rules of banking? Is he endorsing the rules of banking? It looks like he needs glasses, so maybe he has to hold the rules of banking at a distance to read them? Or throw them out? Shouldn’t he be at least kicking the book that is the rules of banking? How does a squinting South Australian holding an old book illustrate the point of thinking differently about banking? Why is the book so old if you’re to think differently. Who is responsible for this shambles of an ad?
Also, on another topic, I loved Shane Wright Economics Editor in yesterday’s West, (which I picked up in the Quokka Arms while waiting for the ferry),opining that sending money to the bush was a total waste, country people were ignorant and uninnovative, and that the cities are where it’s at for everything except yokel wearing bumpkinism. Bravo.
Surely they are innovative in whingeing though Shane?